Welcome and Happy Thursday!
PE firms track hiring velocity and expansion signals to spot breakout companies before they see financials. LPs should do the same with GPs. This post explains why fundraising velocity matters - and at the end, I’ll give you a step-by-step method to track it yourself.
All good PE firms try to identify breakout companies early. But they don’t do this by waiting for the audited financials.
Instead, they track hiring velocity. They monitor expansion signals. They watch customer traction and market behavior.
They’d love to buy in exclusivity. But most of the time, they’re simply trying to build conviction before the process starts. Once the auction begins, prior knowledge is the differentiator.
The same logic applies to GP selection.
But as LPs we are still waiting for the financials.
The Timing Problem
A typical LP market mapping looks something like this:
You screen Preqin or Pitchbook for managers with good performance.
You build a longlist. You rank it. You start at the top.
However, they closed their latest fund two years ago. They’re already preparing the next raise - limited mostly to pre-existing relationships.
Here’s what likely happened:
2020 – Fund III closes
2021–2023 – Deployment
2024 – First meaningful exits
2025 – Performance stabilizes
2026 – Data screens clean
Meanwhile: Fund IV closed. Fund V in market - mostly pre-existing relationships.
By the time the performance data looks “clean,” you are often five or more years into the vehicle’s life.
And the GP is already two steps ahead in the fundraising cycle.
Preqin is excellent for identifying managers worth knowing.
But it is, by definition, backward-looking.
So, if you want to increase your chances of allocation access, you need earlier signals.
The LP Equivalent of Hiring Velocity
So what’s the LP version of tracking hiring momentum or warehouse expansion?
Two simple things:
How fast they closed their latest fund
How much larger it was than the previous one
Or as I like to call it: Fundraising velocity.
Not quartile rankings.
Not consultant summaries.
Actual capital allocation decisions made by LPs who have done the diligence and seen the portfolio from the inside.
What Fundraising Velocity Actually Measures
When a GP goes to market, they’re juggling:
Managing the current fund
Supporting portfolio companies
Executing exits
Running a full fundraising process
If they close in 6 months instead of 18-24, something is working.
If they increase fund size meaningfully - and still close fast - LPs are leaning in.
This isn’t theoretical validation.
It’s capital being committed by investors who:
Sit on boards
Attend LPAC meetings
See quarterly reporting
Underwrite the team repeatedly
That’s real-time signal.
A Real-World Example
In January 2026, BV Investment Partners announced:
Fund XII closed at its hard cap of $2.465bn
Initial target: $2.0bn
First and final close within months of launch
That’s not performance data.
That’s fundraising velocity.
By 2031, you’ll start to have an idea how it performed. But by tracking this signal you already know:
Existing LPs re-upped
The fund upsized materially
The process was compressed
That’s real-time capital validation.
Screenshot of the BV Investment Partners Fundraising Velocity Signal in FundFrame Navigator